10 Comments

One thing the Democrats could do now is make statements of future intent that have present-day implications. For instance, they can respond to Trump's nonenforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by promising future enforcement. This would be a power move against extractive industries, which specialize in suborning governments.

A mere "shadow cabinet" could not issue such credible threats. The DNC could provide such credibility, through its power to limit access to Presidential nominations. Any candidate for the nomination would have to sign the pledge. I don't think you have to worry about Democrats abusing such a mechanism. They're far more likely to do too little than too much.

Expand full comment

Trump’s cabinet has never been about competence or reform. This cabinet is simply a bunch of ‘consiglieres’ dispatched to impose The Boss’s will on the business of governing. They are no more than thugs. They are enforcers. They are there to crack some heads and eradicate anyone or anything that smacks of democratic values and governance. Trump and his Muskreants have basically formed a criminal syndicate that is moving-in on this wide-open territory called The Americas,’ and they intend to make it their domain.

Expand full comment

Radley, you should send this to every Democrat in DC and ask each of them why they aren't doing these simple things. I'm extremely ashamed of the Democrats right now . To quote Herman Wouk, " When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout". Unfortunately the Dems are only running in circles when they should be screaming and shouting.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Radley! All three recommendations are strong and doable. The names you suggest of qualified leaders to implement them is equally good and specific. I particularly like the idea of the "Shadow Cabinet". If Chris hayes and other journalists invite these "shadow secretaries" who can explain the context and negative impact of what Trump is doing to the public in plain language, the impact can be huge! Jamie Raskin for Dept of Justice is a great example. How can we amplify this message to the Democrats AND to the Independents?? We Independents are a powerful political force. Sanders of Vt and King of Maine would be good to enlist.

Expand full comment

Great post. Is anybody listening? I’m going to increase my subscription level despite being a now unemployed USAID contractor.

Expand full comment

The Democrats are in competition with the Republicans, but they have only occasionally been in opposition. Historically, they offered a different approach to managing the working classes and middle classes, primarily for the benefit of the wealthy.

Negotiations with Republicans and "bipartisanship" were on this basis. But the current Republican Party--fascist and counterrevolutionary--has no interest in managing working people at all. It's backers have grown wealthy enough to complete their succession from the rest of American society. The workers can take it (on the chin) or leave it (i.e. starve).

The Democrats need to offer a revolutionary (not reformist) alternative; in other words, they must learn the radically different rules of a radically different political game. In practical terms this means that they must become the exact opposite of the Democratic Party!

Expand full comment

Which means, except for the few mentioned by Radley in this article, we need an entirely different Democratic Party. Since the leeches currently in office won’t admit their complicity or cowardice and resign we are stuck until they can be kicked out or shamed until they leave.

Expand full comment

"88" all by itself has meant "H.H." since at least as far back as '80s racist skinhead crap. What's the "14" part about?

Expand full comment

The 14 refers to the "14 Words" slogan: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/1488

Expand full comment