Very interesting. The cases going back to the judges that tried them is definitely a conflict. I'd love to be optimistic and think a system where you know if goes to someone else if an issue is found would make you behave better the first time, but I know cronyism supercedes that.
It is very disheartening to read about all that evidence destruction without records too. The victims' rights angle is also concerning with that pending case you referenced. Just because you were tricked into thinking the right person was convicted doesn't give you the right to stop an exoneration.
Very interesting. The cases going back to the judges that tried them is definitely a conflict. I'd love to be optimistic and think a system where you know if goes to someone else if an issue is found would make you behave better the first time, but I know cronyism supercedes that.
It is very disheartening to read about all that evidence destruction without records too. The victims' rights angle is also concerning with that pending case you referenced. Just because you were tricked into thinking the right person was convicted doesn't give you the right to stop an exoneration.
Radley, Thanks for the informative Q&A. However, please proofread the newsletter before publishing. I doubt reader's cars are expiring.
"Last year, I lost about 10 percent of my subscribers due to expired or canceled cars."