Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Penfist's avatar

Darwin's Law sure does wreak havoc.

Expand full comment
Guy Carden's avatar

This will be a valuable series; thank you.

One small but important criticism: You say:

“... the federal government’s vast public health funding...”

“Vast...funding” gives a dangerously incorrect message in the context of a political debate about vaccines and public health.

The US spends a “vast” amount on all forms of health care, 17% of Gross Domestic Product according to one 2022 analysis. (https://www.cms.gov/data-research/statistics-trends-and-reports/national-health-expenditure-data/historical# )

Federal spending on public health is a large absolute amount, but only a very small part of this total. Estimating the total expenditures requires work; one careful 2013 study found: “Annual federal public health expenditures average only 0.08 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), 1.5 percent of federal health-related expenditures, and 0.5 percent of total health related US public and private sector expenditures.” (p3-4: https://www.norc.org/content/dam/norc-org/pdfs/PH%20Financing%20Report%20-%20Final.pdf )

It is true that “Public health has traditionally received the majority of its funding from federal sources, with the largest percent generally coming from USDA (which funds WIC), followed by CDC, HRSA, EPA, FDA, and the DHS.” Case studies showed federal funding ranged from 27% to75% for local departments, with most over 50%. (2013 study p73)

You can correctly say that federal funding is crucial for US public health programs, and that Trump’s vaccine policy could do serious damage. But if you say the federal finding is “vast”, you tell Republican voters that defunding public health will make a significant contribution to balancing the budget and reducing taxes.

In fact, public health funding has tended downward for many years, with both state and federal funding decreasing, apparently because of a lack of public support. To give a local example, the public health department in Whitman County in conservative eastern Washington had 20 full-time employees in 2002. During the pandemic in 2021, they had 8 full time employees, and when the professionally-trained Administrator resigned (to take a federal public health job), the County made only minor efforts to replace him.

Guy Carden

Spokane, Washington

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts