Discussion about this post

User's avatar
willoughby's avatar

The effectiveness of the Republican Party's Blitzkrieg assault on the fundamental institutional infrastructure of our democracy does not reflect some particular genius or wily strategic planning on the part of the billionaire-funded madmen carrying it out.

This was not a shock attack on an impregnable fortress, the sudden shock dissolution of a union with strong institutions, a shared civic culture, and a clear vision of governance.

The success of these democracy-haters and kleptocrats reflects the fact that for more than forty years, our democratic institutions have been on the decline, growing weary and decadent, during which time the people have been cynically divided-and-conquered with the most massive propaganda operation in history (at least, outside those practiced over the centuries by the various major Abrahamic faiths).

The Republicans became representatives for a single corrupt constituency--a handful of petulant heirs, princelings, billionaires and pirates who resented the civic constraints of a civilized society, like taxation, oversight, regulation, and equal application of the rule of law, and carefully selected legislators and judges who were willing to abandon the republic and the constitution in order to make sure that rich men wouldn't have to pay taxes, polluters wouldn't be constrained by regulations, and corrupt, crooked businessmen would be liberated from oversight and liability law.

At the same time the Democrats lost their way altogether: divided and at war with each other since the 1970s (split into hostile factions by the humiliation of the 1972 loss and the internal party war between the Carter wing and the Kennedy wing that erupted so destructively in the late 1970s), they have never recovered the sort of unifying identity that existed in the era of FDR and that even, for many years, smoothed over the considerable gaps between the interests of Southern and Northern Democrats.

They descended into deal-making, Clintonian "triangulation" and mealy-mouthed, fearful, Bizarro Solomonic baby-splitting.

With the death of the "smoke filled room," the era of the noisy ideological or profit-driven lobby rose up: Democrats were increasingly, responsive to the loudest voices in the room, all the while guided by polls and operatives rather than by their constitutional oaths or fundamental principles and policies.

They even lost their ability to speak spontaneously, living instead under the weight of focus-grouped mantras, an unhealthy dependence on the noisiest lobbies in the room, and the chidings of the professional strategists and pollsters (who make a good deal of money win or lose, no matter how arrogant, wrong, or detached from the real world they may be).

We were in full decadence long before 2016. Democracies that are still robust don't elect men like Donald Trump, elevate men like John Roberts and Mitch McConnell, or tolerate men like Elon Musk.

This problem was decades in the making. If our republic is to be revived in anything like recognizable form--and there's no guarantee that it ever will--- it will take at least that long. Consider that in the year 2025, we have still not recovered from the aftershocks of a civil war that, theoretically, ended in 1865.

Expand full comment
Ollie Parks's avatar

'Martin has also threatened Sen. Chuck Schumer for publicly stating to two U.S. Supreme Court Justices, 'you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.' Schumer made that statement five years ago."

Well, tit for tat. Here's what Brett Kavanaugh said seven years ago during his sneering, red-faced rant at his confirmation hearing:

" 'Since my nomination in July, there’s been a frenzy on the left to come up with something, anything to block my confirmation,' he said. He referred to Democrats calling him 'evil.' Then he turned directly to Democratic senators on the committee. 'You sowed the wind,' he said, and 'the country will reap the whirlwind.' "

The difference is that Schumer apologized for his unvarnished comment whereas Kavanaugh followed through on his threat by voting with the majority of the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. Wade, among other judicial assaults on our norms.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts